Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZUCCA, Lorenzoen
dc.date.accessioned2006-05-29T14:19:27Z
dc.date.available2006-05-29T14:19:27Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.citationFlorence : European University Institute, 2005en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/4829
dc.descriptionDefence date: 23 May 2005
dc.descriptionExamining Board: Prof. Wojciech Sadurski, supervisor ; Prof. Otto Petersmann (Paris I), co-supervisor ; Neil Walker, reader ; Stephen Perry (NYU), reader
dc.descriptionFirst made available online 28 November 2016
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation deals with one of the most important issues of philosophy of law and constitutional thought: that of conflicts of fundamental rights Comparative analysis, with perspectives from European and American legal systems Analyses actual cases of conflict, such as privacy versus free speech, and the Terri Schiavo physician assisted suicide case This book deals with one of the most important issues of philosophy of law and constitutional thought: how to understand clashes of fundamental rights, such as the conflict between free speech and privacy. The main argument of this book is that much can be learned about the nature of fundamental legal rights by examining them through the lens of conflicts among such rights, and criticizing the views of scholars and jurists who have discussed both fundamental legal rights and the nature of conflicts among them. Theories of rights are necessarily abstract, aiming at providing the best possible answers to pressing social problems. Yet such theories must also respond to the real and changing dilemmas of the day. Taking up the problem of conflicting rights, Zucca seeks a theory of rights that can guide us to a richer, more responsive approach to rights discourse. The idea of constitutional rights is one of the most powerful tools to advance justice in the Western tradition. But as this thesis demonstrates, even the most ambitious theory of rights cannot satisfactorily address questions of conflicting rights. How, for instance, can we fully secure privacy when it clashes with free speech? To what extent can our societies assist people in dying without compromising the protection of life? Exploring the limitations of the rights discourse in these areas, Zucca questions the role of law in settling ethical dilemmas helping to clarify thinking about the limitations of rights discourse.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEuropean University Instituteen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUIen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLAWen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPhD Thesisen
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/7548
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.lcshCivil rights -- Philosophy
dc.subject.lcshConflict of laws -- Europe
dc.subject.lcshConflict of laws -- United States
dc.titleConstitutional dilemmas : conflicts of fundamental legal rights in Europe and in the USAen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.identifier.doi10.2870/928674
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record