Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMARQUIS, Mel
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-21T13:36:03Z
dc.date.available2017-11-21T13:36:03Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationFrédéric JENNY and Nicolas CHARBIT (eds), 2018 competition case law digest : a synthesis of EU and national leading cases, New York : Institute of Competition Law, 2017, pp. 195-225en
dc.identifier.isbn9781939007599
dc.identifier.isbn9781939007605
dc.identifier.isbn9781939007612
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/48925
dc.description.abstractThe starting point for this chapter is that the maintenance of high standards of fundamental rights and due process in competition cases, and in cartel cases in particular, may imply greater effort and costs on the part of competition authorities but they likely enhance, rather than diminish, the effectiveness of the laws they are charged to enforce. In the light of this observation, the chapter reviews a series of developments concerning judicial review, in the broadest sense, at the EU and national levels. Part I of this chapter is entitled ‘Judicial deference versus judicial interventionism’. Part II is entitled ‘Effective judicial protection: procedural guarantees’. These two parts of the chapter are mutually linked, as the implicit and explicit themes underlying each include the role of appellate courts, the constitutional balance between institutions, the relationship between individual and collective interests, and the rule of law.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleJudicial review in cartel casesen
dc.typeContribution to booken


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record