Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLIECHTI, Fabienne
dc.contributor.authorFOSSATI, Flavia
dc.contributor.authorBONOLI, Giuliano
dc.contributor.authorAUER, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-07T08:16:34Z
dc.date.available2018-02-07T08:16:34Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationEuropean sociological review, 2017, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 257-274en
dc.identifier.issn0266-7215
dc.identifier.issn1468-2672
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/51284
dc.descriptionPublished: 30 January 2017en
dc.description.abstractThis article investigates how employers interpret participation in labour market programmes when assessing job candidates. We hypothesize that employers use programme participation to sort applicants. On the basis of a factorial survey experiment, we simulated the recruitment process for two positions requiring different skills in the hotel sector. Recruiters were asked to evaluate fictitious candidates who differ in their participation in active labour market programmes. Our results show that employers take programme participation into account when assessing a candidate. Its impact can be positive or negative depending on the candidate’s distance from the labour market. Candidates more distant from the labour market are evaluated better if they have participated in a programme. For stronger candidates, instead, participation can act as a stigma and worsen the assessment made by the recruiter.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean sociological reviewen
dc.titleThe signalling value of labour market programsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/esr/jcw061
dc.identifier.volume33en
dc.identifier.startpage257en
dc.identifier.endpage274en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue2en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record