Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGASTINGER, Markus
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-16T14:18:01Z
dc.date.available2018-02-16T14:18:01Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationTom DELREUX and Johan ADRIAENSEN (eds), The principal agent model and the European Union, Cham : Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics, pp. 181–202en
dc.identifier.isbn9783319551371
dc.identifier.isbn9783319551364
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/51605
dc.descriptionFirst Online: 18 October 2017en
dc.description.abstractThis chapter argues that conceiving the Commission as a unitary actor is a legitimate simplification of empirical reality for most research purposes. Recently, the principal–agent literature has started examining collective-actor features of agents and suggested that internal conflict is as disadvantageous to agents as it is to principals. By contrast, I argue that intra-agent conflict occurs less frequently and with a lower intensity than is typically the case for collective principals. The Commission-as-agent can overcome conflict quickly due to its hierarchical setup and less stringent decision-making procedures. It may even harness conflict through inter-service consultations to draft better initial proposals. On the political level, open conflict among Commissioners can earn it the reputation of credibly defending controversial sectoral interests in the eyes of affected stakeholders. I develop my argument by focusing on five bilateral trade agreements negotiated from 1970–2007. Generalizing it beyond the case of EU trade policy-making, I focus on empirical, theoretical and methodological reasons justifying many scholars’ choice to model agents such as the Commission as unitary actors.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/33552en
dc.titleEffects of contestation within a collective agent in EU Trade policy-makingen
dc.typeContribution to booken
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-319-55137-1_8
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-319-55137-1
dc.description.versionThe chapter is a revised version of a chapter of the author’s EUI PhD thesis, 2014en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record