Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFADIGA, Riccardo
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-27T07:32:33Z
dc.date.available2018-06-27T07:32:33Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationEuropean journal of legal studies, 2018, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 209-230en
dc.identifier.issn1973-2937
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/56145
dc.description.abstractAdvance pricing agreements (APAs) are the most effective tool for undertakings to reduce the uncertainty regarding the fiscal liability arising out of transactions regulated by transfer pricing. Multinationals rely on APAs to gain confidence in complicated operations and attain better efficiency. In several recent decisions, the European Commission established that APAs can give rise to unlawful granting of State aid, if they provide for transfer pricing methodologies that do not accurately reflect market conditions. However, the Commission does not describe any method to establish the lawfulness of the adopted pricing methodology objectively. Therefore, this article argues that recovery of such alleged unduly granted aid violates the principle of protection of legitimate expectations, which is a fundamental principle of EU law. As such, recovery should be deemed unlawful.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEuropean University Instituteen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean journal of legal studiesen
dc.relation.urihttps://ejls.eui.eu/en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleOf apples, cars, and coffee : against the commission's remedy to unlawful tax rulingsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.volume10en
dc.identifier.startpage209en
dc.identifier.endpage230en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue2en


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record