Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHALMAI, Gábor
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-06T13:56:06Z
dc.date.available2018-12-06T13:56:06Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationReview of Central and East European law, 2018, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 23-42
dc.identifier.issn0925-9880
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/60037
dc.descriptionPublished online: 28 February 2018en
dc.description.abstractThis paper discusses a decision of the Hungarian Constitutional Court issued in December 2016, in which the judges refer to the country's constitutional identity to justify the government's refusal to apply the EU'S refugee relocation scheme in Hungary. The paper concludes that this abuse of constitutional identity for merely nationalistic political purposes discredits every genuine and legitimate reference to national constitutional identity claims, and strengthens calls for an end to constitutional pluralism in the EU altogether.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBrillen
dc.relation.ispartofReview of Central and East European law
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectConstitutional identity
dc.subjectHungary
dc.subjectConstitutional Court
dc.subjectAnti-migration legislation
dc.titleAbuse of constitutional identity : the Hungarian constitutional court on interpretation of article E) (2) of the fundamental law
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/15730352-04301002
dc.identifier.volume43
dc.identifier.startpage23
dc.identifier.endpage42
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue1


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record