Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOOMEN, Barbara
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-06T13:56:09Z
dc.date.available2018-12-06T13:56:09Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationHuman rights quarterly, 2018, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 420-446
dc.identifier.issn0275-0392
dc.identifier.issn1085-794Xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/60045
dc.description.abstractThe ever-increasing scholarship on the politics of human rights focuses on either international treaty negotiations or domestic politics after ratification. It thus misses how the stage of implementation is often crucially set in the period between signing and ratifying. This article addresses this lacuna via an in-depth discussion of the ratification process of the Disability Convention (CRPD) in the Netherlands. In this period, stakeholders highlight certain treaty obligations, while downplaying or ignoring others. This theory of preratification politics calls for more differentiation between treaty obligations and attention to the politics of their mobilization, even in the most monist countries.
dc.description.sponsorshipInteruniversity Attraction Poles Programme
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJohns Hopkins University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofHuman rights quarterly
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectHuman-rightsen
dc.subjectInternational-lawen
dc.subjectRatificationen
dc.subjectTreatiesen
dc.titleBetween signing and ratifying : preratification politics, the disability convention, and the Dutch
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1353/hrq.2018.0021
dc.identifier.volume40
dc.identifier.startpage420
dc.identifier.endpage446
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue2


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record