dc.contributor.author | PISANI-FERRY, Jean | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-12-07T09:32:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-12-07T09:32:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1028-3625 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/60067 | |
dc.description.abstract | Two decades after the high point of global governance in the mid-1990s, hopes that globalisation would be buttressed by a system of global rules and a network of specialised global institutions have been dashed by a series of setbacks. This retreat from multilateralism can be attributed in part to political developments in individual countries. But such factors hide a series specific roadblocks to global governance: the growing number and diversity of countries involved; the mounting rivalry between the US and China; doubts about globalisation and the distribution of the associated benefits; the obsolescence of global rules and institutions; imbalances within the global governance regime; and increased complexity.
Demand for global governance has not diminished, but support for binding multilateral arrangements has. Thus, the narrow path ahead is to establish a sufficient, critical multilateral base for flexible arrangements and to equip policymakers with a precise toolkit for determining, on a field-by-field basis, the minimum requirements for effective collective action. | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | EUI RSCAS | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 2018/65 | en |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en |
dc.subject | Global governance | en |
dc.subject | Multilateralism | en |
dc.subject | Public goods | en |
dc.subject | Collective action | en |
dc.subject | International organization | en |
dc.title | Should we give up on global governance? | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |