Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSARTOR, Giovanni
dc.date.accessioned2006-07-06T14:34:47Z
dc.date.available2006-07-06T14:34:47Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.issn1725-6739
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/6089
dc.description.abstractI shall argue that the concept of (valid) law is a purely normative notion, irreducible to any factual description. This uncontroversial notion, which is shared by all approaching the law from the internal point of view, needs to be distinguished from the competing theories on the grounds of legal bindingness, namely, on the reasons for qualifying a norm as legally valid. I shall consider some implications of this distinction for legal reasoning and for the role of the jurist.en
dc.format.extent211354 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEuropean University Institute
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI LAWen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2006/18en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectLawen
dc.titleValidity As Bindingness: The Normativity of Legalityen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record