Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRODIN, David Emanuel 
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-20T08:26:22Z
dc.date.available2019-02-20T08:26:22Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationEthics, 2015, Vol. 125, No. 3, pp. 674-695en
dc.identifier.issn0014-1704
dc.identifier.issn1539-297X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/61204
dc.descriptionFirst Published: April 2015en
dc.description.abstractImportant moral dilemmas arise in the context of what I have called jus terminatio and Darrel Moellendorf has called jus ex bello- the norms governing the termination of war. I discuss three dilemmas, showing how they also illuminate proportionality and jus ad bellum. 1) morally accounting for new costs that arise during the course of a war; 2) two variants of the 'sunk costs dilemma' in which an agent is permitted to contribute to a project that is all things considered morally unjust, when that project is morally justified on a forward looking basis; and 3) the problem of moral hazard in peace negotiations.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013) / ERC Grant Agreement No 340956 - IOW - The Individualisation of War: Reconfiguring the Ethics, Law, and Politics of Armed Conflict.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/340956/EU
dc.relation.ispartofEthicsen
dc.relation.ispartofseries[IOW]
dc.titleThe war trap : dilemmas of jus terminatioen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1086/679559
dc.identifier.volume125en
dc.identifier.startpage674en
dc.identifier.endpage695en
dc.identifier.issue3en


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record