Wedding a Critical Legal Pluralism to the Laws of Close Personal Adult Relationships

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author MaCDONALD, Roderick
dc.contributor.author McMORROW, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned 2007-05-30T15:47:26Z
dc.date.available 2007-05-30T15:47:26Z
dc.date.issued 2007
dc.identifier.citation European Journal of Legal Studies, 2007, 1, 1 en
dc.identifier.issn 1973-2937
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1814/6853
dc.description.abstract Among private lawyers trained in Western European or Western European-derived legal traditions there is broad consensus about the central features of law. This consensus crystallizes around the features that distinguish law from other normative systems (exogenous criteria of identification), and around the features that distinguish Western European law from other legal orders (endogenous criteria of identification). This paper presents alternatives to both orthodoxies: it adopts a legal pluralist conception of normativity itself, rejecting the tenets of monism, centralism, positivism and prescriptivism that together define conventional conceptions of law’s domain (law’s sites); and it adopts a legal pluralist conception of legal normativity in particular, rejecting both institutionalization and formalization as litmus tests for identifying legal rules (law’s modes). As a ground for exploring the legal pluralist heresy we have chosen a central concept of private law – marriage. Consistently with critical legal pluralist methodology, which emphasizes heterogeneity, flux and dissonance in the normative lives of human agents and which is especially attuned to trajectories of internormativity, we organize this inquiry around (and in counterpoint to) the liturgical form of the Roman Catholic wedding ceremony. Ultimately what is heresy in one normative order may be apostasy in another; and what is apostasy in one may be revelation in a third. In a legal pluralist cosmology, eschatological questions are always present and must always be subject to attornment because they can themselves never be finally decided. en
dc.format.extent 320376 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en en
dc.relation.uri http://www.ejls.eu/
dc.subject Theories of Law en
dc.title Wedding a Critical Legal Pluralism to the Laws of Close Personal Adult Relationships en
dc.title.alternative Marier une analyse critique du pluralisme juridique au droit des relations personnelles entre adultes
dc.type Article en
eui.subscribe.skip true


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record