| Issue Date | View | Title | Author(s) | Type of Publication | Series/Report no. | Abstract |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2011
|
-
|
|
Contribution to book
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
2011
|
-
|
|
Contribution to book
|
-
|
View Abstract
This essay reviews recent developments in liberal international relations theory, both empirical and normative. Furthermore, we seek to highlight parallels between contemporary liberal scholarship on international relations and the thought of classical figures such as John Locke, Adam Smith, Immanuel Kant, Giuseppe Mazzini, and John Stuart Mill. In the first part of the essay we introduce key liberal principles and ideas and identify three different traditions of liberal thought on international relations. Thereafter we discuss the relationship between liberal democracy and international peace, followed by an overview of related scholarship on cooperation among democracies. In the final part of the essay, we briefly discuss two alternative liberal approaches to the ethics of military intervention: we show that although liberal theorists all share a fundamental attachment to representative governance and human rights, they can fundamentally differ in their support for coercive regime change.
|
|
|
2011
|
-
|
|
Contribution to book
|
-
|
View Abstract
This paper explores the phenomenon of dialogue among legislatures in the Canadian context. The work is divided into three parts. In the first part I develop the relation between the concept of “dialogue” and that of “legal transplant” (this section is devoted to the “language” of dialogue) and explain why Canada is a relevant for my investigation. In the second part of the contribution I identify the “actors” and the “typologies” of dialogue at national and provincial level. Finally, in the third part of the paper I select some concrete examples of legislative transplants caused by forms of dialogue among legislatures.
|
|
|
2011
|
-
|
|
Contribution to book
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
2011
|
-
|
|
Contribution to book
|
-
|
-
|