| Issue Date | View | Title | Author(s) | Type of Publication | Series/Report no. | Abstract |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012
|
|
-
|
EUI RSCAS PP; 2012/01; Global Governance Programme
|
View Abstract
Developing a climate of mutual trust and promoting a renewed regional integration, especially one that enables to connect the economic systems and encourage the proliferation of transnational production chains, are two priority courses of action that the current circumstances impose upon Latin America nations and, in particular, the South American space. Both courses of action are interrelated: one feeds the other generating a virtuous cycle between mutual trust and the density of the network of cross interests of all kinds. The new world context will demand a greater regional cooperation, both to control the effects of the financial and economic crisis and to develop an assertive strategy for a competitive participation in global markets. Both, Mercosur and UNASUR, could play an important role if they contribute to renew the approaches and methodologies of regional cooperation and integration.
|
||
|
2011
|
|
Other
|
EUI RSCAS PP; 2011/04; Global Governance Programme
|
View Abstract
The paper by Thomas Cooley (New York University) discusses the challenges for the
European Central Bank in the current situation both in terms of long term fiscal adjustments
and of potential fragility of the European Banking system. The pair of papers by Giancarlo
Corsetti (Cambridge University and EUI) and Massimiliano Marcellino (EUI) focuses on debt
sustainability and the implications of the debt crisis for growth. The paper by Harold James
(Princeton University) focuses more specifically on the challenges to monetary and fiscal
policies in Europe. The joint paper by Joanna Gray and Patrick O'Callaghan (both Newcastle
University) discusses the legitimacy and efficacy of the EU and Member State response to the
sovereign debt problems in the Eurozone from a legal perspective. The joint paper by
Franklin Allen (University of Pennsylvania) and Elena Carletti (EUI) turn the attention to the
issue of systemic risk and the need for macroprudential regulation. Finally, Luigi Guiso (EUI)
tackles the issue of trust and risk aversion in the aftermath of the financial crisis. Our hope is that this joint policy paper will contribute to shaping the debate further and help
policymakers to tackle the challenges emerged in the aftermath of the financial crisis.
Elena Carletti, Giancarlo Corsetti and Saverio Simonelli
|
||
|
2003
|
|
Other
|
EUI RSCAS PP; 2003/01
|
-
|
||
|
2011
|
|
Other
|
EUI RSCAS PP; 2011/03; Global Governance Programme
|
View Abstract
On 15 March 2011 the Global Governance Programme at the EUI hosted a High-Level Policy Seminar
(HLPS) on "European and United States Counter-Terrorism Policies, the Rule of Law and Human
Rights". The first part of the event consisted of a transatlantic dialogue on legal issues in the fight
against terrorism, with addresses by the Legal Adviser of the US Department of State, Harold Hongju
Koh and the EU Counter-Terrorism Coordinator, Gilles de Kerchove. The second part of the HLPS
consisted of focused discussions introduced by academics and clustered around four big themes:
terrorist blacklisting, definitions of terrorism, detention, trial and the role of criminal law in the fight
against terrorism, and finally the positions of the EU and the US in relation to counter-terrorism and
the role of Islam.
This joint policy paper is based on a selection of memoranda written mainly by academics to
launch the debates in the second part of the HLPS. After the event the authors were given an
opportunity to broaden and deepen their short memoranda, without necessarily remaining within the
structure of four theme clusters. Even if the papers were expanded, they were to remain policy papers,
rather than academic articles. As outcome, this joint policy paper consists of six papers by participants
of the HLPS event. They reflect the aim of the HLPS to contribute to a dialogue on counter-terrorism
issues in the United States and in Europe, the broad scope of the themes covered in the HLPS itself
and, perhaps most importantly, an effort to address practical issues and dilemmas.
|
||
|
2011
|
|
Other
|
EUI RSCAS PP; 2011/02; Global Governance Programme
|
View Abstract
The Doha round is going through tough times and at this stage it is impossible to predict its outcome. This is the central message coming from the meeting held on February 4, 2011 at EUI (RSCAS). For reasons having to do with domestic political economy, but also the inability to adjust to the emerging multi-polar reality, negotiators find it hard to come to grips with whatever is required to conclude the round. The most problematic feature is the absence of a Plan B: what do in case current design of talks fails to deliver? Maybe it is time to rethink ambitions and strategies, while accepting that an imminent conclusion has become a remote possibility.
|