Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRIVERET, Régis
dc.contributor.authorROTOLO, Antonino
dc.contributor.authorSARTOR, Giovanni 
dc.contributor.authorPRAKKEN, Henry
dc.contributor.authorROTH, Bram
dc.date.accessioned2007-10-23T10:24:52Z
dc.date.available2007-10-23T10:24:52Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.issn1725-6739
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/7220
dc.description.abstractThe outcome of a legal dispute, namely, the decision of its adjudicator, is uncertain, and both parties develop their strategies on the basis of their appreciation of the probability that the adjudicator will accept their arguments or the arguments of their adversary. Costs and gains have to be balanced in light of this uncertainty in order to identify the most convenient strategies. This paper provides a probabilistic approach embedded into an argumentation framework to capture this uncertainty and its use to determine the expected utility to engage in a legal disputeen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEuropean University Institute
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI LAWen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2007/29en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectLawen
dc.titleSuccess Chances in Argument Games: A Probabilistic Approach to Legal Disputesen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record