Open Access
The electoral consequences of affective polarization? : negative voting in the 2020 US presidential election
Loading...
Files
Electoral_consequences_Art_2022.pdf (724.13 KB)
Full-text in Open Access, Published version
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1532-673X; 1552-3373
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Citation
American politics research, 2022, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 303-311
Cite
GARZIA, Diego, FERREIRA DA SILVA, Frederico, The electoral consequences of affective polarization? : negative voting in the 2020 US presidential election, American politics research, 2022, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 303-311 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/75298
Abstract
About one third of American voters cast a vote more “against” than “for” a candidate in the 2020 Presidential election. This pattern, designated by negative voting, has been initially understood by rational choice scholarship as a product of cognitive dissonance and/or retrospective evaluations. This article revisits this concept through the affective polarization framework in the light of the rise of political sectarianism in American society. Based on an original CAWI survey fielded after the 2020 election, our regression analysis demonstrates that the predicted probability of casting a negative vote significantly increases among individuals for whom out-candidate hate outweighs in-candidate love. Negative voting is less prevalent among partisans as their higher levels of in-group affection can offset out-group contempt. By asserting the enduring relevance of negative voting in American presidential elections, we aim at stimulating further research and discussion of its implications for democratic representation.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Published online: May 2022