Open Access
Dialoguing for due process : Kadi, Nada, and the accession of the EU to the ECHR
Loading...
Files
WP125-Fabbrini_Larik.pdf (406.96 KB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies Working Paper; 2013/125
Cite
FABBRINI, Federico, LARIK, Joris, Dialoguing for due process : Kadi, Nada, and the accession of the EU to the ECHR, Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies Working Paper, 2013/125 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/29578
Abstract
This paper examines the dialogue between the Court of Justice of the EU and the European Court of Human Rights regarding due process rules in the context of targeted anti-terror sanctions imposed by the UN Security Council. By analysing the references that the two courts make to each other’s case law in the recent landmark decisions in Nada and Kadi II, the paper argues that the rivalling yet constructive relationship between CJEU and the ECtHR has played a key role in re-adjusting the balance between international security and fundamental rights in Europe. As the paper suggests, the looming accession of the EU to the ECHR influences the interaction between the two courts, and is already palpable in the case law of both.