Open Access
Knowing EU law : how epistemic and ontological commitments shape different understandings of European law and why it matters
Loading...
Files
LAW_2024_06.pdf (690.95 KB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1725-6739
Issue Date
Type of Publication
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
EUI; LAW; Working Paper; 2024/06
Cite
HESSELINK, Martijn Willem, Knowing EU law : how epistemic and ontological commitments shape different understandings of European law and why it matters, EUI, LAW, Working Paper, 2024/06 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/76827
Abstract
This paper discusses how epistemic and ontological commitments shape different understandings of European law and why it matters. As the paper demonstrates, many key debates on EU law – and some of the fiercest disagreements in European legal scholarship – go back to divergent epistemic and ontological commitments. While these philosophical commitments usually operate in the background, this paper foregrounds them. The hope is that this will contribute to bringing more clarity about the nature of the disagreements in some of the main battlefields in European legal scholarship, as well as on the prospect of reaching agreement. Beyond theoretical clarity, however, the main reason for the present inquiry is more practical and political. A core aim of the paper is to denaturalise the epistemic and ontological groundings of mainstream approaches to EU law and, thus, to demarginalize approaches more peripheral to the centres of power in EU law making and in EU legal academia. There exists no obvious relationship, to say the least, between the political and academic dominance of certain approaches and their epistemic and ontological credentials.