Open Access
In Defence of Pluralism in the Social Sciences
Loading...
Files
Keating&DellaPorta_2010_InDefenceofPluralism.pdf (152.91 KB)
Keating and Della Porta (2010), Pre-print version
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1680-4333
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Citation
European Political Science, 2010, 9, 111–120
Cite
KEATING, Michael, DELLA PORTA, Donatella, In Defence of Pluralism in the Social Sciences, European Political Science, 2010, 9, 111–120 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/16522
Abstract
There are five levels in social inquiry: ontology; epistemology; approaches; methodology; and methods, which we see as means of gathering information. There is no determinate relationship such that one school will consistently choose the same options all the way down. We can cross between what are often seen as competing world views at various of these levels. Natural sciences have not arrived at a unified field theory and there is no reason why social sciences have to do so.
