Open Access
Social preferences trump emotions in human responses to unfair offers
Loading...
Files
Social_preferences_2023.pdf (1.2 MB)
Full-text in Open Access, Published version, OnlineFirst
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
2045-2322
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Citation
Scientific reports, 2023, Vol. 13, Art. 9602, OnlineOnly
Cite
BUSKENS, Vincent, KOVACIC, Ingrid, RUTTERKAMP, Elwin, VAN DE RIJT, Arnout, TERBURG, David, Social preferences trump emotions in human responses to unfair offers, Scientific reports, 2023, Vol. 13, Art. 9602, OnlineOnly - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/76403
Abstract
People commonly reject unfair offers even if this leaves them worse off. Some explain this as a rational response based on social preferences. Others argue that emotions override self-interest in the determination of rejection behavior. We conducted an experiment in which we measured responders’ biophysical reactions (EEG and EMG) to fair and unfair offers. We measured biophysical trait anger using resting-state EEG (frontal alpha-asymmetry), state anger using facial expressions, offer expectancy processing using event-related EEG (medial-frontal negativity; MFN) and self-reported emotions. We systematically varied whether rejections led proposers to lose their share (Ultimatum Game; UG) or not (Impunity Game; IG). Results favor preference-based accounts: Impunity minimizes rejection despite increasing subjectively reported anger. Unfair offers evoke frowning responses, but frowning does not predict rejection. Prosocial responders reject unfair UG offers more often after unmet fairness expectations. These results suggest that responders do not reject unfairness out of anger. Rather, people seem motivated to reject unfair offers when they violate their behavioral code but only when rejection has payoff consequences for the proposer, allowing them to reciprocate and restore equity. Thus, social preferences trump emotions when responding to unfair offers.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Published online: 13 June 2023