Other
Open Access

Keeping Government Secrecy Safe: Beyond Whack-a-Mole

Thumbnail Image
Files
MWP_LS_Curtin_2011_07rev.pdf (125.06 KB)
EUI MWP WP 2011/07
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1814/18641
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1830-7736
Issue Date
2011
Type of Publication
Other
Keyword(s)
Secrecy; Openness; Leaking; National security; Administrative rationale; European Union; Internal security; Checks and balances
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
EUI MWP LS; 2011/07
Cite
CURTIN, Deirdre, Keeping Government Secrecy Safe: Beyond Whack-a-Mole, EUI MWP LS, 2011/07 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/18641
Abstract
The concept of secrecy as a mechanism for not providing government information, on the one hand, and the commitment to openness of government, on the other, reflect certain historical understandings of the relationship between a government, citizens, officials and information. Within democratic systems of government secrecy has been an essential ingredient irrespective of the existence or otherwise of a written Constitution (eg. US and the UK). The transparency ‘explosion’ of recent decades both in rhetoric and in law has been matched by a parallel growth in secrecy regulation and practice at all levels of government, including, in Europe, supranational government (the EU). Leaking has always had a symbiotic relationship with secrecy. What has changed in the information age is that (leaked) information can be shared right across the globe through the Internet in an unstoppable fashion (Wikileaks). This lecture focuses on the understudied phenomenon of government secrecy, its nature, structure, categories and its multiple layers. These are explored from the perspective of (representative) democracy and of constitutional law. The basic argument is that secrets can be protected more effectively and more legitimately if government secrecy is reduced overall. This will mean more ‘shallow’ (less deep) secrets, refining access control and introducing second order disclosure requirements in the context of institutional checks and balances.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
The lecture was delivered on Wednesday 16 March 2011
External Links
Publisher
Geographical Coverage
Temporal Coverage
Version
Source
Source Link
Research Projects
Sponsorship and Funder Information
Collections
EUI MWP Lecture Series (2007-2016)