Against the failures of risk regulation : liability and safety in air traffic management (ATM)
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1867-299X
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2013, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 175-189
Cite
SIMONCINI, Marta, CONTISSA, Giuseppe, Against the failures of risk regulation : liability and safety in air traffic management (ATM), European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2013, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 175-189 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/30477
Abstract
This article aims to analyse liability issues as a further means to regulate risks, in case the precautionary measures of the delivered safety system fail. Through liability, the risk that cannot be prevented can be transferred onto those parties who are in the best position to spread them. The allocation of liability thus works as an incentive to the correct functioning of the preventive measures. Liability rules appear to be a key legal remedy which can ensure both tort reparation and a fair and efficient distribution of burdens in a legal order. In this vein, air traffic management (ATM) is addressed as a case study, which shows the main issues and the gaps that liability rules face when dealing with the trade off between risk and safety as conveyed by technology. After having clarified the nature of the relations between risk and liability on the one hand, and automation and liability on the other hand, this article analyses liability issues in the framework of ATM by approaching this topic in a comparative way between the National Airspace System (NAS) of the United States of America (USA) and the Single European Sky (SES) of the European Union (EU).