Open Access
Citizens and transatlantic free trade agreements : how to reconcile American 'constitutional nationalism' with European 'multilevel constitutionalism'?
Loading...
Files
LAW_2016_17.pdf (861.37 KB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1725-6739
Issue Date
Type of Publication
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
EUI LAW; 2016/17
Cite
PETERSMANN, Ernst-Ulrich, Citizens and transatlantic free trade agreements : how to reconcile American ‘constitutional nationalism’ with European ‘multilevel constitutionalism’?, EUI LAW, 2016/17 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/41345
Abstract
The EU free trade agreements (FTAs) with Canada and the USA aim at protecting transnational public goods - like a rules-based, transatlantic market - that could be progressively extended to other European and North-American FTA member states and serve as a model for reforming also worldwide trade rules and governance institutions. As explained by democratic and cosmopolitan republicanism and 'law and economics', international law and governance can protect public goods more effectively and legitimately if citizens are empowered as 'democratic principals' and republican 'constituent powers' to hold multilevel governance institutions legally, democratically and judicially accountable for their frequent governance failures. The Lisbon Treaty established a 'cosmopolitan foreign policy constitution' requiring 'protection of its citizens', 'strict observance of international law' and rights-based market regulations also in the EU's external relations (cf. Arts 3, 21 TEU). This contribution criticizes the EU policies of disempowering citizens in FTAs with constitutional democracies and undermining their fundamental rights and judicial remedies. Without stronger accountability to its citizens, the EU cannot address its crises of legitimacy and disregard for rule of law.