Can Habermas' Discursive Ethics Support a Theory of the Constitution? - Towards a Critique of the Attempt to Replace the Unity of Substantive Universal Reason by a Procedural Rationality of Argumentation
| dc.contributor.author | LADEUR, Karl-Heinz | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2003-07-01T07:40:59Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2003-07-01T07:40:59Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1999 | |
| dc.description | Digitised version produced by the EUI Library and made available online in 2020. | en |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/149 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | European University Institute | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | EUI LAW | en |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | 1999/04 | en |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en |
| dc.title | Can Habermas' Discursive Ethics Support a Theory of the Constitution? - Towards a Critique of the Attempt to Replace the Unity of Substantive Universal Reason by a Procedural Rationality of Argumentation | en |
| dc.type | Working Paper | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| eui.subscribe.skip | true | |
| person.identifier.other | 26340 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 340e58f1-fe7a-499a-87f0-6cb6a119cd89 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 340e58f1-fe7a-499a-87f0-6cb6a119cd89 |