Judicial interactions upholding the right to be heard of asylum seekers, returnees and immigrants : the symbiotic protection of the EU Charter and general principles of EU law
Loading...
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISSN
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Federica CASAROSA and Madalina MORARU (eds), The practice of judicial interaction in the field of fundamental rights : the added value of the charter of fundamental rights of the EU, Cheltenham ; Northampton ; Massachusetts : Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2022, pp. 263-287
Cite
MORARU, Madalina Bianca, CLEMENT, Marc, Judicial interactions upholding the right to be heard of asylum seekers, returnees and immigrants : the symbiotic protection of the EU Charter and general principles of EU law, in Federica CASAROSA and Madalina MORARU (eds), The practice of judicial interaction in the field of fundamental rights : the added value of the charter of fundamental rights of the EU, Cheltenham ; Northampton ; Massachusetts : Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2022, pp. 263-287 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/74285
Abstract
Whilst it is up to the European Union’s Member States to ‘provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law’ (Art. 19(1) Treaty on European Union (TEU)), the determination and enforcement of the European (Union) standard of ‘effective legal protection’, encompassing judicial independence, has become the challenge for the rule of law (in the light of Art. 2 TEU), the right to a fair trial (Art. 47 Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFR)), for the effectiveness of Union law2 and, as a result, for the entirety of the European Union legal system.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Published online: 4 February 2022