Excessive Pricing: Towards clarity and economic coherence
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1744-6422; 1744-6414
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 2010, 6, 4, 891-910
Cite
CALCAGNO, Claudio A., WALKER, Mike, Excessive Pricing: Towards clarity and economic coherence, Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 2010, 6, 4, 891-910 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/15203
Abstract
One of the thorniest areas of antitrust enforcement is whether, and how, to deal with excessive pricing allegations. Even in jurisdictions that have laws against excessive pricing, there has been little case law on the issue. A recent dispute over the pricing of flat steel in South Africa provides helpful guidance on the correct approach to excessive pricing cases. The Competition Tribunal took a structural approach and deduced the existence of excessive pricing on the basis of super-dominance and market segmentation. The Competition Appeal Court overturned this decision and clearly stated that (1) an empirical exercise comparing prices with cost benchmarks is required in assessing these cases, and (2) excessive prices need to be judged against the long-run average costs of an efficient firm. A purely structural approach was not deemed adequate. In this article, we describe the case and explain why the judgment by the Competition Appeal Court is sound from an economic perspective and why it sets an important precedent in this area of competition law.