Open Access
Inventors and Impostors: An Economic Analysis of Patent Examination
Loading...
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1725-6704
Issue Date
Type of Publication
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
EUI ECO; 2009/28
Cite
SCHUETT, Florian, Inventors and Impostors: An Economic Analysis of Patent Examination, EUI ECO, 2009/28 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/12051
Abstract
The objective of patent examination is to separate the wheat from the chaff. Good applications - those satisfying the patentability criteria, particularly novelty and nonobviousness - should be accepted, while bad applications should be rejected. How should incentives for examiners be designed to further this objective? This paper develops a theoretical model of patent examination to address the question. It argues that examination can be described as a moral-hazard problem followed by an adverse-selection problem: the examiner must be given incentives to exert effort (looking for evidence to reject), but also to truthfully reveal the evidence he finds (or lack thereof). The model can explain the puzzling compensation scheme in use at the U.S. patent office, where examiners are essentially rewarded for granting patents, as well as variation in compensation schemes across patent offices. It also has implications for the retention of examiners and for administrative patent review.