Open Access
The Court of Justice in the archives project : analysis of the Consten and Grundig case (56/64 and 58/64)
Loading...
Files
WP_ AEL_2021_02.pdf (1.03 MB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1831-4066
Issue Date
Type of Publication
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
EUI AEL; 2021/02
Cite
BACHARIS, Grigorios, The Court of Justice in the archives project : analysis of the Consten and Grundig case (56/64 and 58/64), EUI AEL, 2021/02 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/71538
Abstract
This working paper is part of the Court of Justice in the Archives Project. It focuses on an
analysis of the dossier of the Consten and Grundig case. In Consten and Grundig the Court
introduced many of the fundamental concepts and guiding principles of EU competition law.
The release of the dossier de procédure sheds light on the thought processes that led to this
judgment. The dossier confirms that the Court’s choice to stick with the “object” analysis when
dealing with vertical restraints harmful to market integration, was by no means unavoidable; it
presented a heavily contested legal issue, with strong arguments arguing for the opposite
position. In fact, the parties and the intervening governments followed a litigation strategy,
based on economic data and comparative law, which was never analysed in its entirety by the
Court or the subsequent literature. In this way, the present study helps contextualise the
Court’s choice to give precedence to the single market imperative when applying competition
law over all other concerns: the Court understood itself as a driver of European market
integration. Parallel to that, the dossier provides a valuable insight into how the various actors
involved in the dispute perceived their role and interacted with each other during the formative
days of EU competition law.