Open Access
Bentham and the oppressed
Loading...
Files
Campos Boralevi_Bentham_1984WM.pdf (118.98 MB)
Full-text in Open Access, Published version
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Berlin ; New York : De Gruyter, 1984, European University Institute, C, Political and social sciences, 1
Cite
CAMPOS BORALEVI, Lea, Bentham and the oppressed, Berlin ; New York : De Gruyter, 1984, European University Institute, C, Political and social sciences, 1 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/18557
Abstract
One of the most controversial and stimulating subjects of the debate, which has characterized Bentham studies in the last thirty years, has been that of defining clearly the boundaries between his utilitarian philosophy and classical liberalism, in the political as well as in the economic fields. Revisionism1 in Bentham studies has touched particularly on questions concerning the passage from a self-interested, individualistic psychology to a normative concern for the greatest happiness of the greatest number, discussing Bentham’s notions of liberty, of the role of the State, of social justice, of ‘influence’, i.e. briefly, of the relationship between individuals and the State. The present work aims to make a contribution to this debate, by analysing these themes from a new perspective, that of Bentham’s attitude towards the oppressed as a whole, and towards definable groups, and appraising his proposals, general and particular, towards remedying their situation. It is generally agreed that Bentham exhibits an attitude of generic solidarity towards the oppressed: but what has not so far been brought properly to light and analysed in detail, is how this solidarity is expressed, how far it is extended, and what are the limits and contradictions to be discerned in this attitude, when compared to the rest of Bentham’s utilitarian theory. Furthermore, while single aspects of his attitude towards certain categories of oppressed people have to some extent been studied, his general attitude towards the oppressed as a whole has never been subject to a rigorous scrutiny. From the philosophical point of view, the present study is an attempt to throw new light on the internal consistency of Bentham’s system, by analysing, on the one hand, the link between the principles on which his attitude towards the different categories of oppressed persons is based and the more general principles of his utilitarianism; on the other hand, by comparing the consistency of these principles with Bentham’s practical suggestions to remedy their situation — that is, by testing the coherence between Bentham’s theory and the practice he recommends.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
First made available in Open Access in November 2020
This is the first volume which has been prepared for print using the E.U.I. word-processing facilities: this complex and ungrateful work has been done by Ms Clare Gardiner and Ms Oriole Wilson, under the direction of Ms Brigitte Schwab, E.U.I. Publications Officer, to whom the author expresses gratitude.
This is the first volume which has been prepared for print using the E.U.I. word-processing facilities: this complex and ungrateful work has been done by Ms Clare Gardiner and Ms Oriole Wilson, under the direction of Ms Brigitte Schwab, E.U.I. Publications Officer, to whom the author expresses gratitude.
External Links
Publisher
Geographical Coverage
Temporal Coverage
Version
Published version of EUI PhD thesis, 1980