Different fields, different appropriateness? : unpacking emerging normativity in China’s AI governance
Loading...
Files
Different_fields_2025.pdf (608.21 KB)
Full-text in Open Access, Accepted version
License
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1460-3691; 0010-8367
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Cooperation and conflict, 2025, OnlineFirst
Cite
ZHANG, Qiaochu, Different fields, different appropriateness? : unpacking emerging normativity in China’s AI governance, Cooperation and conflict, 2025, OnlineFirst - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/93922
Abstract
How does a state initially form its stance on artificial intelligence (AI) governance before projecting it onto the international stage? Drawing on field theory, this article argues that such formation is both a pluralistic process – where diverse normativities, or understandings of appropriateness, emerge across intersecting yet distinct fields – and a dynamic one, shaped by competition among various actors seeking to influence the state’s overall approach. Using China as a least-likely case study, this article finds that different normativities of AI governance emerge across three fields: security, technology and diplomacy. These variations are driven by two factors: (1) the specific issues at stake within each field and (2) the dominant actors whose practices produce these normativities. It introduces two mechanisms to explain how these diverse normativities combine to shape China’s overarching, state-level normativity regarding AI governance. This analysis extends a Bourdieu-informed perspective on norm research, showing the complexity and fluidity of emerging normativities as well as the hierarchies and power relations that shape them. It also offers empirical insights for working with China on prospective global AI governance frameworks.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Published online: 04 November 2025
External Links
Publisher
Geographical Coverage
Temporal Coverage
Version
Source
Source Link
Research Projects
50696b88-f2c1-4957-b72e-5bccffec1ad2
Sponsorship and Funder Information
This research is part of a project which has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 852123).