‘Napoleonic constitutionalism’ : legal universalism or political particularism?
Loading...
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Mónica GARCÍA-SALMONES and Pamela SLOTTE (eds), Cosmopolitanisms in Enlightenment Europe and Beyond, Bruxelles : P.I.E. Peter Lang, 2013, Multiple Europes ; 49, pp. 141-158
Cite
PRUTSCH, Markus Josef, ‘Napoleonic constitutionalism’ : legal universalism or political particularism?, in Mónica GARCÍA-SALMONES and Pamela SLOTTE (eds), Cosmopolitanisms in Enlightenment Europe and Beyond, Bruxelles : P.I.E. Peter Lang, 2013, Multiple Europes ; 49, pp. 141-158 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/72099
Abstract
This article has two aims: firstly, to shed light on the driving force of “Napoleonic constitutionalism” as a means of restructuring Europe politically; secondly, to evaluate the extent to which Napoleonic constitutionalism can actually be claimed to have paved the way for legal universalism, and to assess its political repercussions in the long term. With a view to provide food for thought rather than a comprehensive account of the subject, focus is put on the German Confederation of the Rhine and the Bavarian Constitution of 1808 in particular, which is reputed to have been one of Napoleon’s “satellite constitutions”.

