'(Im-)proper' members with '(im-)proper' families? : framing spousal migration policies in Germany
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1369-183X; 1469-9451
Issue Date
Type of Publication
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Journal of ethnic and migration studies, 2021, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 379-396
Cite
BLOCK, Laura, ‘(Im-)proper’ members with ‘(im-)proper’ families? : framing spousal migration policies in Germany, Journal of ethnic and migration studies, 2021, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 379-396 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/66005
Abstract
Even more than other types of migration, liberal democracies allow family migration based on the recognition of the individual right to protection of marriage and family of their members. Restricting family migration, which is increasingly happening all over European states in the past two decades, is thus framed within the liberal rights paradigm. The article critically scrutinises the discursive strategies and categories of policy-makers in Germany employed to justify restricting spousal migration 2005-2010. Following the logic of a 'liberal discursive constraint', restrictive policies infringing upon the right to family protection are introduced and legitimised by political actors not by questioning or qualifying the right as such, but rather by constructing certain categories of 'improper' marriages and 'improper' members. Especially by co-opting the issue of gender equality, Muslim minorities in Germany are discursively positioned outside of the supposedly liberal national community and thus the infringement upon the protection of marriage and family is justified.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
First published online: 17 Jul 2019