Hard Responses to Corruption: Penal Standards and the Repression of Corruption in Britain, France and Portugal
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
0925-4994
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Crime Law and Social Change, 2002, 38, 3, 267-294
Cite
DE SOUSA, Luís, Hard Responses to Corruption: Penal Standards and the Repression of Corruption in Britain, France and Portugal, Crime Law and Social Change, 2002, 38, 3, 267-294 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/16432
Abstract
Despite its difficulties and inconsistencies in framing those practices and conducts recently unveiled by the press and judicial investigations which have caused considerable public discontent, the penal definition of corruption still highlights an interesting conceptual diversity across space and time that should not be overlooked. Most official discussions about and references to corruption and its volume are still framed within these hard parameters. It is, therefore, important to look at the intricacies of corruption as a crime in order to understand the virtues and failures of national repressive efforts. While crime statistics are of limited use for its measurement, they can nevertheless help to interpret the way corruption has been treated through repressive instruments cross-nationally over a period of time. The aim of this paper is to assess the dynamics of the various processes of setting and revising penal standards to the conduct of office holders and the results observable from the application of corruption and related offences across countries with different legal traditions.