Immoral intangibles : engaging with ned snow’s intellectual property and immorality

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorDRAHOS, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-25T11:51:22Z
dc.date.available2024-01-25T11:51:22Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.descriptionPublished: 29 November 2023en
dc.description.abstractConsider a method of torture that inflicts permanent harm. Should we refuse a patent on moral grounds? So begins an inquiry by Ned Snow into property rights in immoral intangibles and moral values. I argue three things in this paper. First there may be cases where we want to keep exclusivity rights in play. I illustrate this with an example of how to use patents to help destroy the tobacco industry. Second I argue that Snow under-utilizes the more radical elements of Lockean desert theory when it comes to a moral assessment of patent law. Finally, I argue that Snow has missed the value that has had the most dominant influence on intellectual property – state security consequentialism.en
dc.identifier.citationJerusalem review of legal studies, 2023, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 124-143en
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jrls/jlad017
dc.identifier.endpage143en
dc.identifier.issn2219-7125
dc.identifier.issn2219-7117
dc.identifier.issue1en
dc.identifier.startpage124en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/76375
dc.identifier.volume28en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.orcid.uploadtrue*
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofJerusalem review of legal studiesen
dc.titleImmoral intangibles : engaging with ned snow’s intellectual property and immoralityen
dc.typeArticleen
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3243-6928
person.identifier.other34740
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationfaba6be3-dd5d-4a94-9458-834c4bfb9327
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryfaba6be3-dd5d-4a94-9458-834c4bfb9327
Files
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.83 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
LAW Articles