Getting to Sweden, part I : war and malfeasance, 1720–1850
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
0080-6757; 1467-9477
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Scandinavian political studies, 2015, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 217-237
Cite
TEORELL, Jan, ROTHSTEIN, Bo, Getting to Sweden, part I : war and malfeasance, 1720–1850, Scandinavian political studies, 2015, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 217-237 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/67825
Abstract
How and why some countries were able to make the historical transition from a patrimonial, nepotistic and corrupt bureaucracy to a clean, Weberian and professionalised one is still an under‐studied topic in the literature on corruption. This article presents original data on such a transition in the case of Sweden, drawing on court hearings of cases of malfeasance among public officials in the period 1720–1850. It is argued, theoretically, that an important explanation for why the Swedish bureaucracy was able to break out of the collective action trap of corruption relates to Charles Tilly's theory of the importance of war for state‐making. Rather than viewing war‐making in itself as a driver of change, however, this article pinpoints the importance of having lost a significant war – in the Swedish case, the war against Russia in 1808–9 – and the constitutional and regime changes this set in motion. Drawing on comparative data on malfeasance, the similarities in this regard between the Swedish and Danish cases are highlighted.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
First published online: 15 March 2015