Taming the Leviathan? : the reason of state in international law
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1388-199X; 1571-8050
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Journal of the history of international law, 2024, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 423-460
Cite
VADI, Valentina, Taming the Leviathan? : the reason of state in international law, Journal of the history of international law, 2024, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 423-460 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/78162
Abstract
In humanist political theory, the reason of state mostly described a course of action that did not follow the usual criteria of law but rather what was useful. Nonetheless, a broader understanding of the reason of state focused on the community’s core values. Such common interests (ius status or ragion di stato) could be contrasted with, and balanced against, those of the international community (ius gentium or ragione delle genti). According to the latter view, the reason of state did not abolish the rule of law. Rather, it indicated state governance to preserve public safety (conservare lo stato). The article investigates how Alberico Gentili (1552–1608), a religious refugee and Regius Professor at the University of Oxford, transplanted the reason of state from political theory into the law of nations while subjecting it to natural law (ius naturalis), which can be compared to the contemporary notion of jus cogens.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Published online: 18 December 2024