Mergers and national champions
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
0019-7416
Issue Date
Type of Publication
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Industria, 2008, XXIX, 2, 245-270
Cite
MOTTA, Massimo, RUTA, Michele, Mergers and national champions, Industria, 2008, XXIX, 2, 245-270 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/17382
Abstract
The suspicion that national governments were in various forms promoting or defending domestic national champions (or discouraging foreign ones) arose in a long list of recent merger cases. This paper provides an analysis of the determinants of merger policy in international markets. We discuss two approaches. First, we examine the strategic policy arguments that may lie behind 'national champions' positions on mergers in an international economy. Second, we study a political economy approach to merger policy, where we move beyond the assumption that governments are pure welfare-maximizers and consider the effects of lobbying by domestic firms. We argue that standard 'strategic trade policy' arguments are probably not the most useful in understanding governments' attitudes towards mergers. Rather, a combination of 'economic' and 'political' motives helps explaining merger policy in international markets.