Open Access
Is flexible implementation an effective and legitimate way to cope with heterogeneity in the European Union?
Loading...
Files
QM-AX-22-033-EN-N.pdf (522.69 KB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
2467-4540
Issue Date
Type of Publication
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Citation
Policy Briefs; 2022/33; Integrating Diversity in the European Union (InDivEU)
Cite
PRINCEN, Sebastiaan, VAN DEN BRINK, Ton, HOPPE, Alexander, HÜBNER, Michael, SMEKAL, Hubert, ZBÍRAL, Robert, Is flexible implementation an effective and legitimate way to cope with heterogeneity in the European Union?, Policy Briefs, 2022/33, Integrating Diversity in the European Union (InDivEU) - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/74521
Abstract
This policy brief brings together the findings from different studies done under Work Package 7 of the InDivEU project. Based on these studies, it formulates a number of more general conclusions and recommendations. The underlying question are how flexible implementation in the EU works and whether it can be an effective and legitimate way to cope with heterogeneity among member states. Flexible implementation allows for a more nuanced balance between EU-level cooperation and member state autonomy than differentiated integration, under which member states are either fully ‘in’ or ‘out’ of an EU-level policy arrangement. In doing so, it may contribute to the acceptance of EU policies by member states. At the same time, flexible implementation presents a trade-off between (the benefits of) flexibility and the level of ambition in an EU policy arrangement, as member states tend to use flexibility to preserve existing domestic policy arrangements. Based on this, we recommend to pay more systematic attention to the potential advantages of disadvantages of flexible implementation when proposing and discussing policy proposals. Moreover, it would be good to stimulate cross-border learning between member states, in order to enhance the innovative potential of flexible implementation.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
External Links
Publisher
Geographical Coverage
Temporal Coverage
Version
Source
Source Link
Research Projects
European Commission, 822304
