Whose self-determination? : barriers to access to emergency hormonal contraception in Italy
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1086-3249; 1054-6863
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 2013, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 139-167
Cite
CEVA, Emanuela, MORATTI, Sofia, Whose self-determination? : barriers to access to emergency hormonal contraception in Italy, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 2013, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 139-167 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/30841
Abstract
In Italy, Emergency Hormonal Contraception (EHC) is a prescription drug, available only in pharmacies. Evidence suggests that a number of doctors and pharmacists refuse to provide EHC, on grounds of conscience, although the exact frequency of this phenomenon is unknown. This creates a barrier to access to EHC for women, thus risking undermining their right to reproductive self-determination. In this article, we aim to offer a clearer empirical and theoretical understanding of the situation and to assess the force of doctors’ and pharmacists’ claims against providing EHC. Unlike standard discussions of the issue, we argue that the category of conscientious objection is not the most appropriate one for making sense of these claims, because they are not grounded in a conflict between two contrasting moral duties. The seemingly forced choice between protecting doctors’ and pharmacists’ professional self-determination and women’s reproductive self-determination could be prevented by distributing EHC without medical prescription and in a number of outlets (including supermarkets), thus relieving doctors and pharmacists from the legal duty to provide it.