The Concept of Power : a constructivist analysis
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1477-9021; 0305-8298
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Millennium : Journal of International Studies, 2005, 33, 3, 495-521
Cite
GUZZINI, Stefano, The Concept of Power : a constructivist analysis, Millennium : Journal of International Studies, 2005, 33, 3, 495-521 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/23698
Abstract
Rather than exploring once again what the concept of power can mean for constructivists, this article analyses what constructivism implies for doing a conceptual analysis; here, of power. It will try to show that besides an analytical assessment (`what does power mean'), a constructivist conceptual analysis includes a study of the performative aspects of concepts (`what does `power' do'?), which, in turn is embedded into a conceptual history or genealogy (how has `power' become to mean and able to do what it does?'). The analysis will show that a neutral or descriptive meaning of power cannot be found, since the meaning of power is always embedded in a theoretical context; hence conceptual and theoretical analysis interact with each other. It will further argue that attributing `power' has the effect of `politicising' issues, moving actions into the scrutiny of a public realm where justifications are needed. Finally, it sketches one hypothetical lineage for understanding the origins of these particular performative effects, which relates developments in German political theory to political realism in International Relations. At the same time, the article is meant to convey a more general point for the relationship between constructivist conceptual analysis and power: by stressing the reflexive relationship between knowledge and social reality, such a conceptual analysis is itself part (but only part!) of a more general constructivist power analysis.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
(Based on parts of Chapter 3 of the author's EUI PhD Thesis, 1994.)