Criminalising foreign fighter travel in order to prevent terrorism in Europe : an illegitimate assault on human dignity?
Loading...
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Christophe PAULUSSEN and Martin SCHEININ (eds), Human dignity and human security in times of terrorism, The Hague : T.M.C. Asser Press, 2019, pp. 241-267
Cite
GHERBAOUI, Tarik, Criminalising foreign fighter travel in order to prevent terrorism in Europe : an illegitimate assault on human dignity?, in Christophe PAULUSSEN and Martin SCHEININ (eds), Human dignity and human security in times of terrorism, The Hague : T.M.C. Asser Press, 2019, pp. 241-267 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/73803
Abstract
This chapter critically assesses the impact on human dignity and human security of the novel offence of ‘travelling abroad for terrorism’ in the European counter-terrorism context. The chapter analyses the emergence of the offence through international legal instruments recently adopted by the United Nations, the Council of Europe, and the European Union. Throughout this analysis, the chapter explores the human rights concerns related to the actus reus as well as the mens rea of the offence of travelling abroad for the purpose of terrorism. The actus reus (travelling to another State) of the offence is defined so broadly that successful prosecution hinges on proving the mens rea (the terrorist purpose) of the suspected foreign fighter. This mens rea is tainted by the legal uncertainties surrounding the definition of terrorism. In the European context, the true purpose of the criminalisation of foreign fighter travel is thus prevention rather than punishment. Suspected foreign fighters are seen as a risk to be prevented rather than as individuals who need to be brought to justice under the rule of law. As they are not treated as ends in themselves, the preventive turn of the criminal law in the foreign fighter context disregards the human dignity of suspected foreign fighters. The chapter concludes that the preventive turn not only constitutes an assault on human dignity, but also a counterproductive method to ensure human security.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Published online: 10 December 2019
External Links
Publisher
Geographical Coverage
Temporal Coverage
Version
The article is a preceding version of chapters 2 and 3 of the author’s EUI PhD thesis, 2021