Stuck in the middle : doctoral education ranking and career outcomes for life scientists
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1552-4183; 0270-4676
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Bulletin of science, technology & society, 2006, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 243-255
Cite
SMITH-DOERR, Laurel, Stuck in the middle : doctoral education ranking and career outcomes for life scientists, Bulletin of science, technology & society, 2006, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 243-255 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/42729
Abstract
Why do some Ph.D.'s languish in positions with little authority, and what does educational background have to do with it? Hypotheses predicted that life scientists with Ph.D.'s from elite programs would be the most likely, those from middle-ranked programs the next most likely, and those from lower ranked programs the least likely to achieve supervisory positions. A sample of 2,062 life scientists with doctorates from U.S. universities was collected from records archived from 1983 to 1995. In contrast to hypotheses, Ph.D.'s from elite and lower ranked schools did not have a significantly different chance of supervising. Within prestigious organizations, however, Ph.D.'s from top 10 programs did have a greater likelihood of leading. Ph.D.'s from middle-ranked programs were less likely to advance into supervisory positions. Qualitative interviews explored how, in a knowledgeexpanding field such as the life sciences, being stuck on the bottom rung early on can adversely affect a scientist's career.