Open Access
Flexible implementation and the EU Sexual Abuse Directive
Loading...
Files
RSC_WP_2022_35.pdf (809.33 KB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1028-3625
Issue Date
Type of Publication
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Citation
EUI RSC; 2022/35; Integrating Diversity in the European Union (InDivEU)
Cite
VAN DEN BRINK, Ton, HÜBNER, Michael, HOPPE, Alexander, CITTERBERGOVÁ, Anna, MAK, Elaine, TAIMR, Anna, Flexible implementation and the EU Sexual Abuse Directive, EUI RSC, 2022/35, Integrating Diversity in the European Union (InDivEU) - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/74736
Abstract
This report concerns the Directive on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography (SAD). It assesses the room for flexible implementation it provides and the way in which EU Member States have made use of this. The sample of Member States includes Czech Republic, Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands. The Directive includes various ways to allow for flexible implementation. The directive establishes thresholds for the maximum terms of imprisonment that the Member States should include in their laws (minimum harmonization). The directive equally contains provisions with elaboration discretion for the Member States, allowing them to further flesh out the content of these provisions in national law. This is especially the case with regard to the provisions on prevention and protection of victims. The directive further contains open-worded and non-defined terms which also allow for differentiated implementation. Our analysis demonstrates that implementation legislation varies quite substantially across the Member States. Frequently, the national implementation strategy has been informed by the wish not to unnecessarily change existing laws. From an input legitimacy perspective this may be criticised, but also be understood from the particular nature of criminal law and legislation. This report has not identified major implementation problems, but especially the open worded provisions may create legal uncertainties.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
External Links
Publisher
Version
Research Projects
European Commission, 822304
Sponsorship and Funder Information
This project received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 822304. The content of this document represents only the views of the InDivEU consortium and is its sole responsibility. The European Commission does not accept any responsibility for use that may be made of the information it contains.