Open Access
A widening authority–legitimacy gap in EU regulatory governance? : an experimental study of the European Medicines Agency’s legitimacy in health security regulation
Loading...
Files
A_widening_authority_legitimacy_Art_2023.pdf (2.34 MB)
Full text in Open Access, Published version
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1350-1763; 1466-4429
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Journal of European public policy, 2023, Vol, 30, No. 7, pp. 1406-1430
Cite
RIMKUTE, Dovile, MAZEPUS, Honorata, A widening authority–legitimacy gap in EU regulatory governance? : an experimental study of the European Medicines Agency’s legitimacy in health security regulation, Journal of European public policy, 2023, Vol, 30, No. 7, pp. 1406-1430 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/75943
Abstract
Agencification in the EU stretches the confines of the European regulatory state to the maximum by extending to policy domains that were formerly the exclusive terrain of national institutions. Although the challenge to legitimize EU-level agencies is widely acknowledged, scant empirical research has been done on the conditions under which EU-level epistemic authority prevails or fails. To fill this gap, we examine whether EU agencies are perceived as more legitimate when the scientific nature of their regulatory outputs is made explicit and whether they start facing grave legitimacy challenges when national-level stakeholders signal disapproval with their scientific recommendations. We draw on a survey experiment with Dutch local politicians to study their legitimacy perceptions about the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and its mandate to authorize vaccines in view of cross-border health security risks. Our data suggest that the EMA is regarded as a highly legitimate agency and that disapproval by national-level politicians and citizens does not undermine its epistemic authority in the eyes of local decision-makers. This study contributes to the scholarship on non-majoritarian institutions’ legitimation imperatives by introducing novel research avenues and analytical tools to continue rigorous empirical testing of the well-established theoretical and normative claims.