Search engines as controllers : inconvenient implications of a questionable classification. Case C-131/12, Google Spain and Google Inc. v. AEPD et Costeja Gonzalez
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1023-263X
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 2014, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 564-575
Cite
SARTOR, Giovanni, Search engines as controllers : inconvenient implications of a questionable classification. Case C-131/12, Google Spain and Google Inc. v. AEPD et Costeja Gonzalez, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 2014, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 564-575 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/34233
Abstract
A striking aspect of the ruling in Google v. Agencia Española de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja Gonzalez is the radical contrast between the Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen and the decision of the Court of Justice (CJEU). Not only did the Advocate General and the CJEU reach contrary conclusions, but they also differing the analysis of essential points of the case and on the comparative assessment of the values at stake. Here, I shall focus on a key point of their disagreement, namely, the classification of search engine operators as controllers. I shall side with the Advocate General on this point, arguing that search engine operators should not be viewed as controllers who process personal data, with regard to the construction and usage of their indexes. I shall also argue that this view could be made consistent with an adequate protection of data subjects, by applying to data protection and search engines the regime of providers’ immunities established by the eCommerce Directive.