Open Access
From the duty to refer to the duty to state reasons : the past, present and future of the preliminary reference procedure
Loading...
Files
EJLS_Special2023_Millet.pdf (274.61 KB)
Full-text in Open Access, Published version
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1973-2937
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
European journal of legal studies, 2023, Vol. 15, SI, pp. 7-36
Cite
MILLET, François-Xavier, From the duty to refer to the duty to state reasons : the past, present and future of the preliminary reference procedure, European journal of legal studies, 2023, Vol. 15, SI, pp. 7-36 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/76139
Abstract
Although national courts of last instance are subject to a duty to refer under Article 267, paragraph 3, TFEU, the Court of Justice has significantly qualified that duty since Cilfit, thereby contributing to making failures to refer a widespread phenomenon. While reasserting a strict duty to refer is no realistic option in view of the workload of the Court, of the habits taken by national courts of last instance and also of the cooperative relationship that underpins the preliminary reference procedure, it was arguably imperative for the Court of Justice to alter its case-law in a way that would, at the same time, keep the flexibility offered by Cilfit, ensure that national courts of last instance do not unduly escape what formally remains of their duty to refer and devise suitable monitoring mechanisms and ultimately sanctions against unlawful failures to refer. The Court of Justice has recently embarked on that path by clarifying the scope of the still relative duty to refer and, above all, by coming up with an absolute duty for national courts of last instance to state reasons when deciding not to refer questions to the Court. While that duty raises new challenges for the preliminary reference procedure, this paper claims that it is a most suitable means to guarantee the effectiveness of the duty to refer. By modifying the place of the parties to the main processing within the preliminary reference procedure, the duty to state reasons does not only enhance the latter's rights but it also heralds a new approach to the issue of the enforcement of the duty to refer.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Special Issue on 'CJEU'
Published online: 19 December 2023
Published online: 19 December 2023