Article
Open Access

The polysemy of skills : exploring country-specific approaches in the knowledge economy

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Access Rights
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1748-5991; 1748-5983
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Citation
Regulation & governance, 2025, OnlineFirst
Cite
CINO PAGLIARELLO, Marina, THIES, Milan, TUBAKOVIC, Tamara, NUNES, Douglas, The polysemy of skills : exploring country-specific approaches in the knowledge economy, Regulation & governance, 2025, OnlineFirst - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/93913
Abstract
This paper investigates how the concept of “skills” operates as a malleable governance instrument in EU policy, allowing for coordination despite diverse national priorities. Analyzing National Implementation Plans (NIPs) of the Osnabrück Declaration, we examine how Germany, France, Sweden, and Spain interpret and operationalize skill formation through nationally specific lenses. Despite being a least-likely case for ambiguity, the NIPs reveal strategic variation: Germany links skills to structural transformation, France to capacitation for growth, Sweden to the integration of disadvantaged groups, and Spain to tackling youth unemployment. These findings show how the EU's use of conceptually ambiguous frameworks enables soft policy coordination without requiring uniform implementation. Polysemy thus emerges not as a weakness but as a functional mechanism that allows Member States to align with EU priorities while preserving domestic institutional logics. The paper contributes to scholarship on EU governance, policy discourse, and the political economy of skills.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Published online: 02 November 2025
External Links
Publisher
Geographical Coverage
Temporal Coverage
Version
Source
Source Link
Research Projects
Sponsorship and Funder Information
This article was published Open Access with the support from the EUI Library through the CRUI - Wiley Transformative Agreement (2024-2027)