Open Access
Using history in Latin America
Loading...
Files
Using_history_2024.pdf (331.69 KB)
Embargoed until 2025
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISSN
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Randall LESAFFER and Anne PETERS (eds), The Cambridge history of international law, Vol 1 : the historiography of international law, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2024, The Cambridge history of international law, pp. 378-427
Cite
BECKER LORCA, Arnulf Arturo Joachim, Using history in Latin America, in Randall LESAFFER and Anne PETERS (eds), The Cambridge history of international law, Vol 1 : the historiography of international law, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2024, The Cambridge history of international law, pp. 378-427 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/77656
Abstract
Latin American international lawyers are prolific historians. However, while having profusely written histories of international law, Latin Americans have shied away from historiographic controversy. Latin Americans have not disagreed much about how to conceive and write history, but they have had sound disagreements about the international law that is constructed by history, they have disagreed over different ways of using history as law. This chapter offers a history of these disagreements. Some Latin-Americans have used universal histories, echoing the familiar Eurocentric history from the Latin-American periphery to the core, in order to gain doctrinal authority to speak and change international law. With a similar goal in mind, other Latin-Americans have used particularistic histories, foregrounding the region’s doctrinal divergences and contributions to universal international law. Universalist and particularistic histories were dominant between the first half of the nineteenth century and the second half of the twentieth century, between independence and the Cold War. Towards the end of the Cold War, these two types of history merged into one, presenting the region’s historical trajectory as in harmony with universal international law. This represents a break. If in the nineteenth century an international legal tradition emerged in Latin-America, during the twentieth century it radicalised, diverging from international law as conceived from the West. From the Cold War merger an endemic history emerged, which depoliticised and deradicalised the Latin American tradition. Exploring this history of history-writing in the region may help rearticulating a more ambitious Latin American international law.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Published online: 06 December 2024