Open Access
Surviving the aftermath of Islamic State : the Syrian Kurdish movement’s resilience strategy
Loading...
Files
MED_WPCS_2020_3.pdf (537.11 KB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Middle East Directions (MED); Wartime and Post-Conflict in Syria; 2020/03
Cite
HAENNI, Patrick, QUESNAY, Arthur, Surviving the aftermath of Islamic State : the Syrian Kurdish movement’s resilience strategy, Middle East Directions (MED), Wartime and Post-Conflict in Syria, 2020/03 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/66224
Abstract
In November 2019, Operation Peace Spring launched by Turkey in the north-east of Syria concluded with no clear winner or loser. In the short term, Turkey's military operation has resulted in a paradox in which the non-state actor targeted thought to be the weaker party – the leadership of the Autonomous Administration – has attained the greater gains, while the more powerful state actors (Ankara, Moscow and Damascus) are either embarrassed or stuck in a wait-and-see situation. Despite its loss of part of the territory it controlled, the Syrian Kurdish movement has retained its military capability and governance structures and its access to oil resources. The resilience of its governance model allows the Syrian Democratic Forces to avert the three main security threats that the Turkish offensive helped amplify: risks inherent in the deployment of the Syrian army; a resurgence of Islamic State; and the situation in camps and detention centres. However, the Kurdish movement will likely not be able to survive in the long term without a “political initiative,” whether in the form of rapprochement with Damascus or de-escalation with Turkey. In the absence of such an alternative, a resumption of direct military hostilities or an increase in various security pressures risk putting the northeast political model under great strain.