Argumentation schemes for statutory interpretation : a logical analysis

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorSARTOR, Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorWALTON, Douglas
dc.contributor.authorMACAGNO, Fabrizio
dc.contributor.authorROTOLO, Antonino
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-19T17:27:17Z
dc.date.available2015-01-19T17:27:17Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractThis paper shows how defeasible argumentation schemes can be used to represent the logical structure of the arguments used in statutory interpretation. In particular we shall address the eleven kinds of argument identified MacCormick and Summers [6] and the thirteen kinds of argument by Tarello [11]. We show that interpretative argumentation has a distinctive structure where the claim that a legal text ought or may be interpreted in a certain way can be supported or attacked by arguments, whose conflicts may have to be assessed according to further arguments.en
dc.identifier.citationRinke HOEKSTRA (ed.), Legal knowledge and information systems (JURIX 2014), Amsterdam : IOS Press, 2014, pp. 11-20en
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/978-1-61499-468-8-11
dc.identifier.isbn9781614994671
dc.identifier.isbn9781614994688
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/34236
dc.language.isoenen
dc.orcid.putcode1814/80928:53752827
dc.titleArgumentation schemes for statutory interpretation : a logical analysisen
dc.typeContribution to booken
dspace.entity.typePublication
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2210-0398
person.identifier.other29040
person.identifier.other34055
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione0511c58-5007-4b10-8d82-e19ca2df8cc2
relation.isAuthorOfPublication68d5acb6-1bbf-4112-822b-6aedaa8bba80
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye0511c58-5007-4b10-8d82-e19ca2df8cc2
Files
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.83 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
LAW Contributions to Books