Open Access
A review of experimental evidence of how communication affects attitudes to immigration
Loading...
Files
Dennison_2022_A_review_of_experimental_evidence.pdf (899.06 KB)
Full-text in Open Access (Published Version)
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
2214-594X
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Comparative migration studies, 2022, Vol. 10, Art. 35, OnlineOnly
[Migration Policy Centre]
Cite
DENNISON, James, A review of experimental evidence of how communication affects attitudes to immigration, Comparative migration studies, 2022, Vol. 10, Art. 35, OnlineOnly, [Migration Policy Centre] - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/75234
Abstract
The need for strategic communication in migration policymaking is increasingly widely recognised. Whereas until recently there was relatively little academic evidence of what forms of immigration communication are effective, the past few years have seen a large amount of new experimental evidence. This article overviews 68 experimental studies, as well as other relevant studies, categorising their findings into nine common communication strategies. Appealing to common interest rather than self-interest, appealing to conformity rather than diversity, migrant descriptions, appealing to common ground, and appealing to empathy are consistently shown to be effective. Fact-checking of the effects of migration and appealing to emotions are mostly shown to be effective, as is appealing to identity where applicable. By contrast, appealing to diversity is consistently shown to be ineffective, while correcting information about migrant stocks and appeals to self-interest are mostly shown to be ineffective. Overall, this review article supports psychological findings regarding attitudinal formation that emphasise sociotropic considerations of the effects of immigration, economic or otherwise, on the collective while offering weaker support for egocentric approaches.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Published online: 30 August 2022